|
In Time of War Talk is Cheap - Nuke'em 'Religion', by definition, is a 'laying back' or 'constraint' against destructive or counter-productive personal human behavior. By definition, the Islamic faith is not a 'religion', and no different than the beliefs or non-beliefs and convictions of the barbarians who attacked and destroyed Rome of the West in the 5th century.
There are 1.6 billion Muslims in the world today, and all of them have declared war on all of western civilization. It is becoming more clearly evident that Iran, Syria and North Korea have allied themselves in this war on all of western civilization. I agree with those who say we are now engaged in WW III - a different war, wherein the Muslims place no value on human life - including their own. With no regard for the sanctity of human life, they embed themselves in schools, hospitals and mosques, using those otherwise civil facilities as safe houses from which they plan and execute their suicide and road bombings. The United States faced down the Soviet Union during the Cold War years with a policy of "massive retaliation", by having B-52s loaded with 'nukes' (hydrogen bombs) at the Arctic Circle 24/7 - I know because I supported that effort (working 70 hrs a week) at Stratedic Air Command (SAC) bases as a Field Engineer for the radar bombing and navigation computer system that made the B-52 bomber a weapon. Islam is not a religion, and Muslims are not religious. Islam is a political ideology worse or more rabid than commmunism/socialism or the abhorrent ideology of the National Socialists (NAZIs) of Germany under Hitler during WWII. All the 'socialists' under the Democrat Party label and some number of members of the US Congress, and a large segment of the U.S. public are arguing that there is "no moral justification" for the war in Iraq. For everyone's edification, there never was and never will be any "moral justification" for any war, past present or future - but there is justification in self-defense, unless you want to commit suicide by supporting your attacker who wants you dead. All the 'socialists' under the Democrat Party label are asking for an 'exit strategy' (?). The only exit strategy in a war is to win it - that is - to overpower your enemy. The exit strategy of WWII by the US and Allies was "complete and unconditional surrender" - which finally occurred with the atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945. Part of domestic US strategy could and should be renunciation of Islam as totally sectarian and have all Mosques removed from US Federal and State Tax Exemption as religious organizations. Finally - as we did to end World War II and promised during the Cold War - implement or execute a policy of massive retaliation - nuke 'em - while we still have the capability to do so - transform selected target areas in Syria, Iran and North Korea into seas of glass - and let the Islamic survivors work and pay the cost for their own reclamation or recovery without financial aid from any bank, or system of banking, on the western side of civilization. To do otherwise will simply prolong the agony of human existence in a world gone mad. A Nightmare Scenario? You have no idea the nightmare scenario you will endure if carrying out a policy of massive retaliation w/hydrogen bombs on selected targets in Syria, Iran and North Korea is not embraced. Return to World War III - Part 1 Return to Home Page |