|
ovaloffice |
|
Essay 7 - Corrective Action - Part 1
The Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776, from rule by the 'remote' government of England, cites that a human's right to Life, Liberty and pursuit of Happiness is a given - a given by God to individuals. It cites that such a right is inalienable by others who have power and authority in the name of 'Government' to make rules that deprive them of that God-given right.
That 'Declaration' goes on to say, that, when any form of government becomes destructive of those ends, it is the "Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
The 'Corrective Action' proposed by this particular Essay is designed to re-organize and limit the powers of government by changing the rules (of and for government) that are destructive of those ends.
The 'Declaration' recognized, that "mankind is more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
The 'Corrective Action', proposed in this particular Essay, is designed 'to institute new Government with rules that preclude and prevent reduction of the individual 'under absolute Despotism'.
The character and form of government of the United States has become a 'socialist puppet government', as a direct consequence of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. There are no stronger words that can be used to describe what has happened to the United States since that Act was passed.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 shifted Constitutional power of the Congress to regulate commerce, coin money and regulate the value of money, to the Executive Branch of Federal Government (Office of President) and to the Executive Board (Board of Governors) of the central banking system (Federal Reserve Banking System) established by that Act. (See Note 1 below:)
Reference the original U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8, General Powers of Congress:
Par. 2. To borrow Money on the credit of the United States. (This gives Congress power to increase the debt limit, which it does, which results in 'inflation', i.e., increase or expansion of U.S. Money Supply that is independent of U.S. population growth. The result is an increase or growth of U.S. money supply that exceeds the natural growth rate of the U.S. population. (This occurs with every nation on the face of this Earth. All nations experience inflation of their national currencies. Only the rates of inflation differ.)
Par. 5. To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the standard of Weights and Measures. (the power to regulate the value of Money was transferred, from the Congress, to the 'Board of Governors over the Federal Reserve Banking System', through the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.)
Under the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, the power of the Board of Governors, over the Federal Reserve Banking System, transcends power and authority of both the Executive and Legislative Branches of government to regulate commerce, coin money and regulate the value of money.
The Executive Branch was sucked into this arrangement because the Office of President has the Constitutional power and authority to make treaties and to make all appointments (albeit with the advice and consent of the Senate. See U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Paragraphs 1. and 2.)
Because it is the universally accepted perception that the Office of President is responsible for direction of the ship of state, the 'Board of Governors' of the 'Federal Reserve Banking System', can make any President look good (influence his re-election), by decreasing interest rates - an action that results in increase of capital for investment or re-investment that stimulates growth of jobs and job opportunities.
Or,
The 'Board of Governors' of the 'Federal Reserve Banking System', can make any President look bad (influence defeat for re-election), by increasing interest rates - an action that results in a decrease of capital for investment or re-investment - a decrease that forces cut-backs and bankruptcies of business structures, resulting in layoffs.
Or,
The 'Board of Governors' over the 'Federal Reserve Banking System' can make the stock market look 'good', by decreasing the 'down payment' (called 'margin') requirement to purchase stock, or 'bad', by increasing the 'margin' (down payment requirement) to purchase stock.
Technical Appendices 1, 2 and 3 provide the technical background for understanding these inter-actions within the reality of the functional and circular flow of money within any national household.
So who is actually minding the store becomes totally unclear, making the election or voting process a 'circus' exercise in futility.
[Under NAFTA (modeled after GATT) and GATT, the U.S. Federal Government in Washington D.C. has been reduced to the status, condition and character of a 'puppet' government. It has been reduced to this status, because the power and authority to regulate commerce on a global scale has been given, by those agreements, to the ministers of the privately owned system of world banking and finance through the Bretton Woods Agreements Act (incorporated into the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 as of July 31, 1945 (59 Stat. 512).]
World bank power and authority is totally above, isolated from and immune to the results of voting elections. Whoever is elected President is subject to the rules of those agreements. At inauguration time, when 'whoever' it is swears on the Bible to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution, that 'whoever' swears to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution as amended by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the NAFTA and GATT agreements.
If he is true to the original principles upon which the United States was founded, 'Whoever' takes the Oath of Office for President of the United States, must modify that oath by taking exception to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (with all of its amendments) and to the NAFTA and GATT agreements that control both international and domestic trade.
Those who profit from the Federal Reserve Banking Act of 1913 and the NAFTA and GATT, will defend them, using taxpayer dollars to fund their defense.
The working men and women who are effected by them in a destructive way are powerless to oppose them.
The 'word merchants', those who never worked in a factory or on an assembly line, or dug ditches, or laid brick, or shoveled coal, for a lifetime of living, don't have the vaguest idea of what all is involved in the establishment and maintenance of an 'industrial engineering and manufacturing capability'. They maintain their ignorance, achieve prominence, and make their monetary profit using the powerful tools of 'ridicule' and 'denial'.
End of Note 1.
As an ideology, 'capitalism' is derived from that fundamental term of the balance equation from accounting principles. That term did not exist in any language until after the balance equation from accounting principles was developed in the 16th Century.
'Capitalism' did not even exist as a concept until after the 16th Century; not until a Franciscan monk developed the 'balance equation' that is the foundation of accounting principles.
It was that foundation that led to development of the new 'economic' (national household management) concept in the 18th Century, that the rights of the individual are superior to the power of the state. It caused the ancient concepts of the sovereignty of kings over their subjects to collapse in the 18th century - evidenced by the American Revolution (1775-1781) that was followed almost immediately by the French Revolution (1789-1799).
The rise of company and corporation 'structures', under the new concept of 'Capitalism' in the 19th century, gave new meaning to private ownership of land and property, and to that period in history called the Industrial Revolution (1750-1850), when new requirements for mining and manufacturing labor were generated.
The new concept of 'capitalism', from accounting principles, and the generation of mining and manufacturing industries, merged during the industrial revolution.
That merger caused the sovereignty of kings to diminish, and give way to the sovereignty of private company ownership and management over the subject populations - the eternal source of the eternally mortal requirement for labor.
The new concept of 'capitalism', because of the new principles of accounting, gave new and added responsibity and power to ministers of banking and finance.
The new power of finance ministers derived and derives from the knowledge and analytical skills required to deal with the algebraic exactness and rigors of tracking the minus (-) of expenses against the plus (+) of income to determine a net balance that is either a 'profit' or 'loss'.
When 'net balance' is a profit, the positive net difference between assets and liabilities becomes 'capital'. (When applied to spreadsheets of business structures, the positive net difference is called 'retained earnings'. When applied to the individual by 'economists', the positive net difference is called 'disposable income'.)
So it is that the low-profile chief finance officer of any business, corporation or state is the real power behind the ownership and management of any business, company, corporation or state.
Oppressive abuses of 'labor' by the new 'Capitalists', the new owners and managers of property, gave 'capitalism' its bad name.
Abuses in the form of child labor, sweat shops, etc., by the 'Capitalists' revived the two-thousand-year-old concept of the structured state originally conceived by Socrates and embellished by Plato. Revival of the 'structured state' took the form of the 'Communist Manifesto' by Engles and Marx in the 19th century, and the Russian Revolution in 1917 that established the Communist State in the wake of World War I in the 20th century.
World history is a history of conflict and war over little or vast differences of poverty and wealth, and ownership of property, punctuated only briefly by brief periods or intervals of peace. So it is that all conflicts and wars between individuals, tribes and nations in the recorded history of man have always planted new seeds for the next conflicts and wars between individuals, tribes and nations.
No one imagined or could forsee national jealousies and fears by France of what was emerging as Germany's dominance of Europe by development of its industrial engineering and manufacturing capability in the years immediately preceding World War I.
Any specific chain of events or description of balanced or unbalanced trade conditions and circumstances that caused World War I are left to the professional historian.
However, 1913 marked the end of an era, the end of separation between the Old World in the east and the New World in the west, and a War that forever changed the face of the earth and international politics.
After the first ever war that involved every developed nation in the world, it is now, as it was then, rational - logical - just plain common sense - to consider that nations must have some sort of vehicle or mechanism, whereby leaders of sovereign nations have a means for discussing and resolving balance (or unbalance) of trade and trade deficit problems without having to go to war to solve them. Such was the 'common sense' that gave rise and popular support to the formation of a 'League of Nations' in the wake of World War I.
But the 'League' didn't come into being until 1920. It lay dormant, in a semi-comatose state, until it was disbanded in 1946 - replaced by the United Nations in 1945.
Before the 'League' could be formed to construct a post-war treaty of peace designed to heal wounds, a vengeful and vindictive "Treaty of Peace with Germany" confiscated all of Germany's mineral and industrial properties, and redrew the map of national boundaries in Europe.
Confiscation extended to the property of Germany's citizens, no matter where in the world they might reside.
Details of the Conference and "detail (of ) the economic and financial provisions of the Treaty of Peace with Germany" was provided in an 'eyewitness account' of the formation of the 'Treaty of Versailles' by John Maynard Keynes. (See Economic Consequences of Peace, by J.M. Keynes, Copyright 1920 by Harcourt, Brace and Howe, Inc.)
Prophetic in his Introduction to his eyewitness account, Keynes writes, "Moved by insane delusion and reckless self-regard, the German people overturned the foundations on which we all lived and built. But the spokesmen of the French and British peoples have run the risk of completing the ruin, which Germany began, by a Peace which, if it is carried into effect, must impair yet further, when it might have restored, the delicate, complicated organization, already shaken and broken by war, through which alone the European peoples can employ themselves and live."
The spokesmen for England and France laid the foundation for World War II because the Peace Treaty they constructed ('Treaty of Versailles') inspired revenge and restoration of Germany through revival of German nationalism, (including the heinous revenge) so successfully orchestrated by Adolph Hitler.
A different approach to world peace was taken after World War II. It involved reconstruction of Europe and Japan through confiscation of the vast labor and material resources of the United States (totally naive, then and now, in international relations and negotiations ) via:
The first action of the United Nations to function as a world government body of legislators and a tribunal was the conduct of the Nuremburg war-crime trials of those deemed responsible for Germany's atrocities committed during World War II. (It never extended itself to conduct similar trials for war crimes and atrocities committed by Japan.)
Plans for establishment of four World Trade Zones by the year 2020, patterned after GATT, through GATT, NAFTA, the South American and the Asian-Pacific international trade agreements is a published fact.
So too is the mechanism where all international trade dis-agreements are placed under control by a World Trade Organization (WTO) with headquarters in Brussels, Belgium.
Existence of four world trade zones and the WTO spells 'World Order', or 'World Order Democracy' - identities from the lips of George Bush, a former President under the Republican banner, and Bill Clinton, a President under the Democratic banner.
These are not identities invented by the un-informed "Jane and Joe six-pack of beer" voter, these are expressions introduced by authority at the highest level of government in the United States.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 established the central banking system in the United States. In doing so, it also extended Constitutional powers of the Executive Branch (in the person of the President) for foreign affairs, reducing the Office of the President to the low status and function as simply an 'agent' for private world banking and financial interests in the hands of the invisible - low profile - few.
Because of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 - public law of the land that enables government banking and finance interference with the natural demand and supply forces that drive the costs of product in the market place - and because of its many amendments - it no longer matters who is elected President. Whoever the President is, he will take his direction from the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board according to the power and authority given to the Chair and the Board by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
Subject to the Public Law inherent and embedded in the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, with all of its amendments - the invisible constitution of government - the Office of the President takes its orders from the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board for all related appointments, for all functions of the Department of the Treasury and foreign affairs.
Direction of foreign affairs is included in this indictment because of the inextricable link between the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank and World Bank operations.
There is no one in sight, as President, or as a majority leader in the House or Senate, with intelligence and bravery sufficient to take on the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the world bank; certainly not anyone in sight in either the Democrat or Republican Party. Even if such a person existed, he could not garner enough private financial and ideological support to take on the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 because the voting majority would not understand what he is talking about.
It becomes a great stretch of imagination to believe, or to accept, that enactment of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and all of its subsequent amendments were accidents, as opposed to products of design by both foreign and domestic private banking interests - the money changers in the temple.
Does this mean that development of World Government is a 'conspiracy'?
If you want define 'conspiracy' as a sell-out of the United States by every President and Congress since the Great Depresssion in the name of peace, world trade and democracy, then I would call it a 'conspiracy'.
Any honest review of the history of the deliberations of the framers of the U.S. Constitution discloses they rejected the concept of democracy and inflation of money - just as Aristotle rejected the structured communal state concepts of his predecessors, Socrates and Plato, when the city-states of ancient Greece were collapsing around them more than two thousand years ago. (See the Five Great Dialogues by Plato, specifically, Republic: Book II and Republic: Book V).
The United States is not just in a state of decline. It has already collapsed - it has been confiscated. The labor intensive industrial base and manufacturing capabilities that saw it through two World Wars and the wars in Korea and Vietnam no longer exist.
The George Bush Persian Gulf War was not a war. Compared to the 'Battle of the Bulge' in World War II, it was a military exercise that lasted only hours, to practice World Government under the auspices of the United Nations to contain renegade nations.
Future wars will not be sophisticated Nintendo-Games-like exercises, like the Persian Gulf 'war' to show-off sophisticated electronic command, control and communications capabilities. They will be like the bloody atrocities in Yugoslavia; or more, like the bloody atrocities of gangs and drive-by shootings in crowded municipalities like New York, Miami, Chicago or Atlanta. Why else the promotion of gun-control laws against the constitutional rights of citizens to keep and bear arms by the Federal Government?
We are not living on borrowed time, we are living on borrowed money. This once great nation has been sold-out to foreign and world banking interests against George Washington's best advice in his farewell address:
"Harmony, liberal intercourse with all Nations, are recommended by policy, humanity and interest. But even our Commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand: neither seeking nor granting exclusive favours or preferences; consulting the natural course of things; diffusing and deversifying by gentle means the streams of Commerce, but forcing nothing; . . . . constantly keeping in view, that tis' folly in one Nation to look for disinterested favors from another; that it must pay with a portion of its Independence for whatever it may accept under that character; that by such acceptance, it may place itself in the condition of having given equivalents for nominal favours and yet of being reproached with ingratitude for not giving more. There can be no greater error than to expect, or calculate upon real favours from Nation to Nation. . . ."
From the bottom up in any system of living in some organized way, the individual and the male and female parent family is at the bottom - the foundation of any nation, state or civilization.
Return to Home Page
|